Outcome |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Students will write well organized, cohesive papers.
|
Work functions well as a whole. Piece has a clear flow and a sense of purpose. |
Response has either a strong lead, developed body, or satisfying conclusion, but not all three. |
Uneven. Awkward or missing transitions. Weakly unified. |
Wanders. Repetitive. Inconclusive. |
Incoherent and fragmentary. Student didn't write enough to judge. |
Students will use appropriate voice and tone in writing.
|
Voice is confident and appropriate. Consistently engaging. Active, not passive voice. Natural. A strong sense of both authorship and audience. |
The speaker sounds as if he or she cares too little or too much about the topic. Or the voice fades in and out. Occasionally passive. |
Tone is okay. But the paper could have been written by anyone. Apathetic or artificial. Overly formal or informal. |
"I just want to get this over with." |
Mechanical and cognitive problems so basic that tone doesn't even figure in. Student didn't write enough to judge. |
Students will demonstrate original, creative writing.
|
Excellent use of imagery; similes; vivid, detailed descriptions; figurative language; puns; wordplay; metaphor; irony. Surprises the reader with unusual associations, breaks conventions, thwarts expectations. |
Some startling images, a few stunning associative leaps with a weak conclusion or lesser, more ordinary images and comparisons. Inconsistent. |
Sentimental, predictable, or cliché. |
Borrows ideas or images from popular culture in an unreflective way. |
Cursory response. Obvious lack of motivation and/or poor understanding of the assignment. |
Rubric is a modification of one presented by: University Community Links (n.d.). Hot writing rubric. Retrieved August 19, 2008 from http://www.uclinks.org/reference/evaluation/HOT.html