For a printable copy of this rubric, please click here.
Psychology Paper Example Rubric
Learning outcome: Students will be able to analyze, interpret, and apply psychological research findings.
Work product: Research Paper
Learning Outcome Component
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Application of statistical analysis |
|
|
|
|
Selects appropriate methods of statistical analysis |
Choice of methods of summarizing and analyzing data is ideal for the dependent variable(s) and for answering the research question |
Choice of methods of summarizing and analyzing data is appropriate for the dependent variable and for answering the research question
|
Some methods are not appropriate for the dependent variable or for answering the research question |
None of the methods are appropriate for the dependent variable or for answering the research question |
Performs statistical analysis correctly |
Data analysis is complete and thorough; statistical analyses are performed properly |
Statistical analyses are performed properly; data analysis may be incomplete; analyses, though correct, are lacking in thoroughness
|
Data are not analyzed beyond the descriptive level; inferential statistics are not performed or are performed incorrectly |
There is no attempt to summarize or evaluate the data and only raw data are reported |
Interpretation of findings |
|
|
|
|
Interprets research findings appropriately |
Draws inferences that are consistent with the data and scientific reasoning |
Draws some inferences that are consistent with the data and scientific reasoning, but fails to draw other conclusions which may be deduced from the findings
|
Overinterprets findings and draws conclusions from the data which may not be justified, or fails to draw conclusions which may reasonably be deduced from the findings
|
Does not provide an interpretation of the data
|
Provides an explanation of the findings |
Explains expected results and offers explanations for unexpected results |
Explains expected results but does not adequately explain unexpected findings |
Does not fully explain expected results or adequately explain unexpected results
|
Does not explain expected results, and ignores unexpected results |
Application of findings |
|
|
|
|
Identifies limitations of the study |
Methods of the study are critically evaluated; identifies questions that are unanswered; identifies and describes suggestions for further research |
Identifies questions that are unanswered; identifies and describes suggestions for further research; does not critically evaluate methods of study
|
Identifies questions that are unanswered; does not identify or describe suggestions for further research; does not critically evaluate methods of study |
Methods of study are not critically evaluated; does not identify questions that are unanswered; does not suggest further research or follow-up studies |
Applies findings to other contexts |
Discusses possible applications of findings to contexts outside that of the study |
Discusses possible applications of findings to contexts outside that of the study, but the discussion is somewhat unclear
|
Applications and extensions of research findings do not follow logically from the original research question
|
Does not discuss applications or extensions of the research findings |
Rubric is a modification of one presented by: Maki, P. L. (2004). Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the institution. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.